CHARITY ENTREPRENEURSHIP

  • Incubation Program
    • Incubated Charities
  • Research
    • Charity Ideas
    • Animal Welfare Reports
    • Health Reports
  • About Us
    • Our Track Record
    • Jobs
    • CE Resources
    • Contact
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Sign up
  • Incubation Program
    • Incubated Charities
  • Research
    • Charity Ideas
    • Animal Welfare Reports
    • Health Reports
  • About Us
    • Our Track Record
    • Jobs
    • CE Resources
    • Contact
  • Blog
  • Donate
  • Sign up

BLOG

How do you pick what research to do within animal rights?

5/27/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
Currently there is almost no research in the area, so you would have to narrow it down using heuristics.

The Old Way

Last year, I somewhat informally narrowed down the options until I chose to run a study on handing out educational leaflets. The rough steps I followed were to:

  1. Ask experts and Executive Directors of charities what studies would be valuable.
  2. Look at interventions with promising preliminary findings. In this case, leafleting already showed positive results in one study.
  3. Rule out the ones that are too costly or would take too much time.

The New Way

I have recently been thinking of a different system that may work better than this. It basically boils down to using the heuristic of neglectedness a lot more, and would look more like the following:

  • Check which animal populations are the most neglected. This can be determined by looking at total funding per animals killed. Animal Charity Evaluators (ACE), thankfully, already has this data in a neat chart. This step would suggest that farm animals are the first area to look at.
Picture
  • Assess which broad interventions the farm animal donations have supported: for example, political lobbying, vegetarian advocacy, meat alternatives, etc. Compare this to their broad accomplishments, like passing laws, persuading people to become vegetarian, or increasing the sales of meat alternatives. This information is not easy to acquire and I am not sure what conclusion it would yield.
  • Narrow the broad interventions down to more specific actions and find out how much funding goes into each. For example, in outreach, specific actions might include flyering, documentaries, events, etc. Then, compare this to the achievements in each of the areas. For outreach, this information could be acquired via surveying vegetarians about what convinced them to switch over. This has already been done by The Humane League Labs.
Picture
  • Based on this you would be able to get a sense of which interventions seem to have an oversized impact per cost. You could then design a randomized controlled trial that would be feasible cost/time-wise and test what kind of an impact the intervention had in a much more thorough way.

By using this system instead of the one I used before, I might have gotten the same result, but, even at worst, I would have also gotten more of a sense of what other areas might be worth testing. At best, I might have found areas that looked considerably more promising than flyering. For example, if documentaries have both a larger effect and have less funding than vegetarian flyering, it would be better to test the effects of screening a vegetarian documentary instead.
It is important to look at the pros and cons of a method, and here are some of the potential flaws with this system:
​
  • I can imagine it being worth putting more time into checking out all the broad interventions. Legal advocacy, veg outreach, and meat alternatives might all look promising and be worth investigating at a more specific level.
  • It might be better to simply determine what areas work on average, instead of figuring out the best specific intervention.
  • This method might take so long that it would not be worth the time.

That being said it seems like a possibly interesting way of determining what specific interventions would be worth running a randomized controlled trial on in an area that has very limited evidence so far.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    CE RESOURCES

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Animal Research
    Ask Research
    Broad Research
    CE Organization
    CE - Organization
    Corporate Outreach
    Family Planning Research
    How To Run A Charity
    Incubated Charities
    Incubation Program
    Mental Health Research
    Poverty Research
    Preparing To CE
    Reports - Animals
    Research
    Research Process
    Staying Altruistic
    Top Charity Ideas

    Additional Resources

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    August 2017
    April 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    October 2015
    August 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    September 2014
    May 2014
    January 2014

About Us

Charity Entrepreneurship (CE)  is a project of Charity Science Foundation of Canada, a foundation registered in Canada (charity number 80963 6236 RR0001). CE supports its incubated charities through a fiscal sponsorship with Players Philanthropy Fund (Federal Tax ID: 27-6601178), a Maryland charitable trust with federal tax-exempt status as a public charity under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Contributions to CE are tax-deductible to the fullest extent of the law.
Privacy Policy: ​You can read our Privacy Policy here
Terms of Use: You can read our Terms of Use here

Connect

Contact us

Please use our contact form.